…and a happy humbug!
…and a happy humbug!
Got into Toronto this past week, so I’ve now had the chance to try both the PS4 and the Xbone. Quick thoughts on each:
So I head into the Microsoft store to mess about with a Surface Pro. I see the Xbone display. I see it’s playing Forza and not-Panzer-Dragoon. I pick up the controller and play and…well…it’s basically an Xbox.
Yes, the graphics are somewhat better. But that controller still feels pretty much just like an Xbox controller. The finger rumble is sorta neat, though I found it distracting on Forza. I also like the weird angular trigger thing, which meant that you could easily two-finger the triggers. I’m absolutely down with that: I HATE four-fingering the triggers, always have, and likely always will. Since I’m not a huge fan of trigger-centric console game design anyway, though, it’s not a deal-maker or deal-breaker for me. Other than that, it’s just a 360 controller. You’ve used them.
Forza was “driving game”. Fun, convenient speed-up and slow-down lines, maybe slightly too realistic for my tastes, but that’s about it. We’ve been playing this since the PlayStation. Not-Panzer was Not-Panzer: you moved in a path and shot stuff, though it didn’t have that lock-on feature yet, and it didn’t have that classic Panzer aesthetic that made that series so damned good.
Of the two, I’d take Not-Panzer, though it made me pine for Panzer Dragoon Saga like you wouldn’t believe.
None of the weird TV stuff was available, so I have no idea how that works. Ditto with the Kinect stuff. I did scroll through the Home page to see what was there, though. I didn’t have time to see much, but what I saw was “lots of downloadable media bits”.
Verdict: Absent the weird media stuff…it’s an Xbox. Just, y’know, more so.
I also head into the PlayStation store. (Toronto has a PlayStation store. Bet you didn’t know that.) I bellied on up to one of the kiosks and picked up that controller.
It’s not basically a PS3. The controller’s why.
No, I’m not one of those writers who whinges about the Dual Shock 3. I still chalk that one up to a review community that’s still just a wee bit too fixated on the 360 as the “default platform”, with everything else treated as a deviation from that default. The DS3 isn’t a 360 controller, so you read moans about how it doesn’t “feel right”. The PC uses a different kind of interface that’s more sit-forward instead of sit-back, so you read moans about how they “just want to play on the couch”. What it comes down to, I believe, is just the inherent conservatism of the community; they have a platform and ecosystem they’re invested in, and while they’ll venture away from it when they have to, but they’ll grumble the entire way.
The Dual Shock, a controller whose design nobody took issue with back when the PS2 was the Default Platform, just ended up the victim of that misguided conservatism.
But I digress.
That said, the new PS4 controller is, yes, better. The new wider shape and paddle elements are easier to hold, leaving your hands at slightly less of an angle. The L2/R2 triggers are definitely easier to use, since they feel like they’re travelling slightly farther and don’t feel as spongy as the old DS3 triggers or as flimsy as the 360 controller. (I actually preferred it to the Xbone controller, though I’ll still grant that nice The concave design of the thumbsticks and slightly higher tension works, too. The touchscreen is a clever addition. The “share” button feels gimmicky, but it’s a gimmick I can get behind. I don’t have a problem with the DS3, but the DS4 is an improvement.
Playing Knack, though, showed that although things might control slightly differently, they just don’t look that much different. Launch games are never examples of the best a system has to offer, and they certainly aren’t usually gameplay powerhouses, but they at the very least are supposed to look different enough that you get that “Wow!” reaction. Every previous PlayStation had one of those: The PS1 had Toshinden, the PS2 had Dynasty Warriors 2 and Ridge Racer V, the PS3 had Resistance: Fall of Man…but the PS4’s big all-audiences exclusive, Knack, just didn’t have it. All those little parts were neat, but just made me think of a somewhat fighty version of good ol’ Katamari Damacy. Beyond that, it looked like an HD console game. That’s it.
There was a standout moment, though: Octodad: Dadliest Catch. Octodad on a controller works exactly as well as I’d hoped. It’s silly stretchy fun that has you maniacally swinging those sticks around like you’re back catching monkeys in Ape Escape on the PS1. It’s an utterly ludicrous concept that shows why indie gaming is so damned much fun, and seeing it up on display at that kiosk was a genius way for Sony to demonstrate that they’re as indie friendly as any console in industry history. It also kinda cements that whole “it’s utterly PC-developer friendly” thing. I’m still used to PS3 being the Weird System of the generation, like the Saturn or the Turbo. Having a Sony box be accessible after all this time is something to get used to.
Verdict: It’s not a PS3. It’s not even a PS2. It’s something new. It doesn’t look new, but between the controller and the sheer joy of Console Octodad, it feels new.
Sort of ironic that this ended up that way, and I might feel differently once I get a chance to play around with the Kinect 2. But there we are.
(Postscript: I don’t hate the Kinect concept, and truth be told, I don’t have a problem with MS or the Xbox, either. I like that the 360 gave Sony the kick in the ass they needed, and Halo’s good stuff. I just dislike the whole Default Platform thing. I have ever since it was the NES.)
It’s been far too long.
It’s been hard to write lately. I’d underestimated circumstances’ ability to affect one’s ability to sit down, focus, and communicate. Starting to think I’m a bit like Spider Jerusalem, who “never could write when [he’s] out of the city”. Urban and suburban/exurban life are more strikingly different than I’d ever known–and while I might still take up a standing offer to enjoy true rural existence for a little bit, this exurban exile reminds me of how much I appreciate and depend on the energy and vitality of the city.
I kind of sympathize with Andrew Ryan’s Periclean Bioshock slogan about how “all good things flow into the city”. An odd sentiment in a profoundly physiocratic country like Canada. It’s still never felt truer.
(Oh, and if anybody from Bento Miso in Toronto reads this: I profoundly miss your space and the company I found within it.)
Anyway, I did get into the beta of Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft. It’s been a great experience. It’s amazing how such a slight game has revived my bruised faith in Blizzard.
Why “revived”? Several reasons:
That didn’t happen. You can get by quite nicely without paying for cards, and cards aren’t tradeable at all. You won’t make money playing Hearthstone, and you shouldn’t.
If anything, spells and abilities are almost better than their WoW counterparts. Almost all are immediately recognizable, even if you don’t look at the description. That’s a lot more like DOTA2 or League of Legends, boding well for Blizzard’s newly retitled MOBA, Heart of the Storm. That’s probably why Hearthstone is rivalling those games when it comes to streaming popularity right now.
Yes, the game still has balance issues. Rogues were overpowered and Priests useless right before I got in, and from what I’ve seen, the reverse is now the case. (Though I’d hate to see them remove Mind Control, since it’s one of the most interesting effects in the entire game, and used to great effect in a way that it never was in World of Warcraft.) There are still too many classes that are near completely dependent on rare cards to be viable. And I feel that the way the matchmaking rating system works could stand to be a bit more transparent.
Honestly, though…those are minor issues and almost certainly why this beta is happening in the first place. They’ll sort ’em out. I, finally, have faith in them.
This isn’t about video games. But it IS about art. And it’s interesting.
One of the Junicorn designers I wrote about last week, Daniele Hopkins, is also an artist, who works works with her partner, Kyle Duffield, on a variety of technology-related projects. Some are related to gaming—like their cheeky, hilarious, yet surprisingly seductive Itagaki Interface. Most are not. Most focus, instead, on the connection between nature and technology. A while ago they did a video project called Drone, which showed the blurred lines between the insectoid and technological versions of that term. On Friday, at the Noise Project interactive art show in Toronto, they premiered Hive, which addressed similar themes.
Hive isn’t a game or a video. It’s a real device: a lashed-together-looking nest of wiring and speakers that hangs from the ceiling of a small room, emitting seven different synthesized droning sounds that mix and clash and cancel each other out as they (and you) move around the room. Built out of a hexagonal chicken-wire-like grid and fully exposed speakers, it has the look of a wasp’s nest that you’ve carelessly ripped open; on first apprehension, that chaotic droning triggers the deep fear of watching in horror as the nest’s inhabitants bear down on its hapless interlopers.
Except that they’re robots. Angry, tiny, relentless robots.
Conversation with Duffield and Hopkins turned it around, though, and brought out a different feeling entirely. Duffield and Hopkins are enormous insectophiles. Both refuse to squish or harm insects in their homes, making a point of carefully collecting them and depositing them outside. They find insects fascinating and beautiful; and talking with Kyle and Daniele about their work building Hive showed how much much affection they have towards technology as well.
After talking with them, a funny thing happened: I ended up finding Hive oddly…soothing. After wandering around the Noise Project, I’d find myself returning to the Hive room again and again. Part of that was because Kyle and Daniele were genuinely interesting and entertaining company. Even when they weren’t there, though, I’d still come back and find myself relaxing in the company of Hive itself. It wasn’t angry. It was complex, it was fascinating, and it was welcoming.
Kyle and Daniele are both moving on to gaming-related projects. Daniele has said that she’s going to keep on working on her Unity game about Internet surveillance. Kyle is working on a really neat title involving the Kinect and asynchronous gameplay that sounds fascinating, but I can’t really get into yet.
What really riveted me, though, was the news that they’re also looking into Oculus Rift development. They’d said that they were going to see about pulling the money together themselves. That’s great, and I support them in that…
…but after seeing Hive, Drone, Itagaki Interface and the rest of their work, I’m confident that if anybody’s willing to pony up and play the patron, you’ll get something amazing out of it. Think about it.
(Or, as it’s technically called, V.A.T.S.)
As I mentioned in the last piece on Fallout 3, the game really feels like a Elder Scrolls game. It feels a LOT like an Elder Scrolls game. The way you explore, the way you interact with NPCs, the way that you engage with the maps…there’s a reason I called it “Elder Scrolls 4.5”. It really does feel like Oblivion, almost without exception.
VATS is the exception. VATS, for those of you (who are you?) who haven’t played a 3D Fallout yet, is the system where you pause the game, pick your targets, and the game shoots for you, with the success based solely on the character’s statistics, instead of your own reflexes and ability. It’s a callback to the turn-based nature of the old Fallout games, where they played more like Baldur’s Gate in that you were able to pause and give orders.
VATS is one of the main reasons I wanted to try Fallout 3. It sounded amazing. Calling your shots and watching it unfold? Awesome, right? No. Not awesome. VATS just feels weird.
First, it means that the game doesn’t really play out much like an FPS, since you don’t have the fire-and-response gameplay cycle. You can try to play it like an FPS, but it doesn’t work. You don’t have down-the-sights aiming, you don’t have aim correction (keep in mind, I’m playing on a console), and the weapons feel like peashooters, which is a really big problem considering players have strong expectations of what assault rifles, pistols, and rocket launchers are able to do derived from thousands of hours of modern multiplayer manshoots. It’s understandable, since VATS means that the weapons would be totally unbalanced if they hit hard. But without VATS, the game’s just unpleasant.
Worse, though, is that I end up finding disconnected from the environment and what’s going on in it, because the game’s constantly pausing for these slow-mo shootouts. That sense of connection is what makes Elder Scrolls games work. You aren’t “directing”, you’re acting. You don’t tell your character “swing the sword”, you just swing the damned sword. That’s been the case going all the way back to Arena. Bethesda have been progressively learning this lesson over, and over, and over again, and each time they come out with a new Elder Scrolls, it shows they’ve understood and embraced it that much more.
(Plus, the fact that hunting rifle is a better close-up weapon than a machine pistol is ridiculous, yet that’s how VATS works, since you’re near-invulnerable while you’re inside it and there’s no way for them to get “inside” your range.)
What results is something that’s neither fish nor fowl. The “direction” element of VATS that was supposed to mollify fans of the old Fallout games won’t, because this is fundamentally an Elder Scrolls RPG, not a Baldur’s Gate-style RPG, so you don’t have that tactical feel that made the turn-based gameplay of those older games compelling. Yet the game can’t fully embrace its status as a FPS or as a modern, immersive, Elder Scrolls-style RPG, because the game simultaneously near-mandates the use of immersion-breaking VATS while making the non-VATS combat surprisingly unsatisfying.
Don’t get me wrong. That doesn’t make it a bad game. I’m enjoying it immensely. It also doesn’t mean I don’t enjoy using VATS on occasion, though I never really find myself enjoying the non-VATS shooting. It’s just more than a bit of a surprise that something I’d looked forward to trying ended up being less of a blessing than a curse.
Yes, in the midst of the comments fighting over some damnfool RPS piece about how game criticism is just fine…
(…hint: it’s not, a million untrafficked blogs don’t make up a Pauline Kael, you need mainstream soapboxes to get mainstream cred and TotalBiscuit ain’t that…)
I ran across a comment so glorious I just had to share it. Ladies and Gentlemen: the Citizen Kane of gaming is…
…Ultima VII. It’s always been Ultima VII.
Charles Foster Kane is a thinly disguised allegory for William Randolph Hearst. It is an awesome film even if you don’t understand the allegory, but you can see that it’s the drive to tell a true story in the guise of fiction that pushes the makers to create a truly great film. The story itself couldn’t be told as non-fiction because of the power of the Hearst company and the litigation that would have followed. Citizen Kane is often considered the creators’ best work, despite the fact that it is a black and white film and “old”.
The Guardian is a thinly veiled allegory for Electronic Arts. It is an awesome game even if you don’t understand the allegory, but you can see that it’s the drive to tell a true story in the guise of fiction that pushes the makers to create a truly great game. The story itself couldn’t be told as non-fiction because the Ultima series is fantasy, and slipping a demon-god with a cult into the fantasy world made more sense than having an Eeeevil Corporation(TM) try to infiltrate Britannia directly. Ultima VII is often considered the creators’ best work despite the fact that it is 2D and “old”.
Me, I was always more of a Wing Commander fan. It’s still absolutely perfect, though. There’s little to add, beyond an observation that big open-world sandboxes like Ultima 7 are now the rule in the fantasy genre, rather than the exception. The perspective might change, but the idea’s the same, and that idea’s absolutely dominant.
So congrats to Electronic Arts: you not only were the Hearst analogue in the Citizen Kane of Games…you killed off its Welles. Props.
Oh, shit, a supermutant! Forget my minigun, I need something with real power…a hunting rifle!”
You probably know that I’ve been doing a long series on the Elder Scrolls series. I’d had to put that aside for a little bit, since I’d been playing Morrowind on a nice PC that, sadly, I don’t (can’t) use anymore. I have access to a PS3 right now, and I’ve been playing some console stuff…but none of it really fit into that framework.
Then I tried out Fallout 3. Finally. After all these years.
It’s like I never stopped. For better or worse, Fallout 3 really, really feels like an old-style total conversion of the post-Daggerfall Elder Scrolls games.
Sure, there are no knights and demons and whatnot, but that’s not what Elder Scrolls’ gameplay flow, the experience, had ever been about. the Elder Scrolls had always been about other things.
THAT is Elder Scrolls. And, yes, THAT is Fallout 3. Same damned thing.
For those about to grab their pitchforks, though…that isn’t a bad thing. I was never really that attached to the old Fallout games, but I knew enough about them to realize that they were themselves a conversion of the sort of gameplay that you’d find in an old top-down RPG in the vein of Planescape:Torment or Baldur’s Gate. You had turns and squares and stats and countryside and towns and encounters and all of that. Sure, it had guns and rads, but it also had everything else that’s defined that genre since the Gold Box games.
Remember, genres in games have absolutely nothing to do with setting. You can have a fantasy shooter like Panzer Dragoon, a steampunk FPS like The Order: 1886, or a historical sandbox like Assassin’s Creed 2. The setting genre and the game genre are only connected if you want them to be connected.
So, before you get all shouty, think about it. So what if Fallout 3 is basically an Elder Scrolls game? It’s still an RPG. It’s just a different kind of RPG.
All that said…there’s still VATS. And, yeah, VATS is the one thing that makes modern Fallout weird. More in the next post. I guess the series is back on. It’s just taking a bit of a radioactive detour.
This is a joke, right?
No. Really. This must be a joke.
In an internal email sent by Ballmer today, shared online via official Microsoft channels, the CEO advised Mattrick’s directs to report to Ballmer himself, as it appears the company has no immediate replacement for the departing exec.
It’s unclear if this is a temporary measure, or if Microsoft is actively seeking a candidate for the position, which will be crucial as the November launch of Xbox One approaches.
Here’s the email in full:
“Zynga announced today that Don Mattrick would be its new CEO, effective July 8. This is a great opportunity for Don, and I wish him success. Don’s directs will report to me and will continue to drive the day-to-day business as a team, particularly focused on shipping Xbox One this holiday.
This is ridiculous. RIDICULOUS. Even if Ballmer had the faintest clue about gaming, and there’s been no indication that he does, he’s still got way bigger problems to deal with. He needs to bring the public around on Windows 8 or reorient the OS in reaction to 8’s failure, he needs to revive the Surface brand after the debacle that was Windows RT, he needs to get Windows Phones in people’s pockets he needs to hire proper replacements for Sinofsky and Allard to bring some vision back to the company…
…and he’s supposed to be the gaming guy, too?
Sure, if the Xbox were a year out, that’d be fine. But it’s four months out. Even if he’s only taking over temporarily until they hire a replacement for Mattrick, that’s still months before they have a new guy up to speed and able to handle the situation. Mattrick’s replacement in the event he left should have been sorted out ages ago, so that someone could smoothly pick up the slack.
This is honestly more of a bad sign than the DRM thing was. That was just arrogance. This is laugh-out-loud incompetence. The latter’s far harder to fix and they simply do not have time. What happened to the smoothly, almost impressively competent Microsoft that conquered the sector in the first place?
There are nowhere near enough snarky things that could be said at this news.
So instead, post Xbone, I think I’ll just limit myself to wishing Microsoft’s Xbox unit all the best.
Edit: Actually, I’ll add a note of Serious Thought, especially since I did a bit of media coaching for a young Toronto-based activist just this past Friday.
Mattrick’s problem wasn’t the Xbone’s various DRM problems. People in that GI comment thread pointed out that those decisions were almost certainly made before he got there. I think they’re right. That sort of thing takes ages to implement. He might well have been served up the proverbial shit sandwich.
Mattrick’s problem is that he screwed up in how he handled it. They should have had an ironclad, well-laid-out strategy on how to deal with the fallout from this. They should have had a crisis management and/or conflict management strategy ready to go immediately. They should have figured out how to defuse this LONG before E3, and definitely after the Orth debacle.
Hell, I could have done it for them. It’s not hard. I can think up some strategies right now:
If you really wanted to demolish, you could demonstrate that the games will be cheaper by announcing that you’re making your own games cheaper. Not third party games, YOUR games. Microsoft games. Sell ’em for fifty bucks, or even forty five. It’s not like you’re Nintendo and dependent on first-party sales. Your money’s being made on license fees and Xbox Live anyway, and you’ll generate so much goodwill that it’ll blow that little Sony video out of the water.
(Can you tell that I’ve been thinking a lot about crisis management recently?)
That was Mattrick’s job. SELLING it was Mattrick’s job. Managing this crisis was Mattrick’s job. He didn’t just fail, he actively made it worse. He came across as an arrogant ass with all that “go buy a 360” stuff, and making that the center of the company’s messaging was inane beyond all recognition.
He failed. Badly. And now he’s moved on to another company in crisis, arguably a WORSE crisis. I just hope he does better this time. He could hardly have done worse.